After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Via lie recognition tools examined at the boundary to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilized for asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to steer these devices and to pursue their legal right for safety.
It also demonstrates how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the 'circuits of financial-humanitarianism' that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers' socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from being able to access the programs of security. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary asylum consultation mechanisms of such technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects just who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault's notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double result: although they aid to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They can be positioned in a 'knowledge deficit' that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of'machine mistakes' which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.