After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these systems. Right from lie recognition tools analyzed at the boundary to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to navigate these devices and to go after their legal right for safeguards.
It also displays how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the 'circuits of financial-humanitarianism' that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers' socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from getting at the programs of safeguards. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault's notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these technologies have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students although they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a 'knowledge deficit' that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of'machine mistakes' which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.